Auditory Processing Differences in Stuttering: Evidence from Load Theory of Attention

Conference Paper Full-text available CC BY 4.0

Auditory Processing Differences in Stuttering: Evidence from Load Theory of Attention

FK
Fjorda Kazazi
University College London

Abstract

Background. The load theory of attention proposes that the detection of irrelevant information depends on perceptual load, with higher load reducing processing of distractors. This framework is relevant to listening effort and auditory scene analysis, where cognitive resources must be allocated across competing sounds. People who stutter (PWS) may rely more on cognitive resources during speech, but it remains unclear whether similar differences extend to non-speech spatial auditory processing.

Methods. Twenty-two PWS and 22 matched controls completed a dual-task spatial auditory paradigm with varying perceptual load. Auditory stimuli were spatialised to simulate real-world listening environments. Primary task performance (accuracy and reaction time) and secondary task detection sensitivity (DS) were measured to assess auditory processing under cognitive demand.

Results. Both groups showed reduced accuracy and increased reaction times with higher load. However, PWS showed lower detection sensitivity overall, with a significant Group × Load interaction indicating greater impairment under high load. Exploratory analysis showed that DS predicted group membership (AUC = 0.81).

Conclusions. These findings suggest reduced auditory processing efficiency in PWS under high cognitive load in spatial listening conditions. The results extend load theory to auditory cognition in stuttering and highlight detection sensitivity as a potential behavioural marker of listening effort in complex acoustic environments.

Figures

Figure 1. Dual-task spatial auditory paradigm
Figure 1. Dual-task spatial auditory paradigm with primary task target stimuli and secondary task CS stimuli in a spatialised listening layout.
Figure 2. Secondary task detection sensitivity by load and group
Figure 2. Secondary task detection sensitivity (d') for control and PWS groups at low (Load 1) and high (Load 6) perceptual load, showing a significant Group × Load interaction.
Figure 3. ROC curve for detection sensitivity predicting group membership
Figure 3. ROC curve showing that detection sensitivity predicted group membership (AUC = 0.806).

Presentation

Publication Details

Conference
7th Virtual Conference on Computational Audiology (VCCA 2026)
Location
Virtual (on-line)
Presented
June 2026 · Podium presentation
Proceedings DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20735749
License
Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 (Zenodo proceedings)
Sample
N = 44 (22 PWS, 22 matched controls)

Links

Suggested Citation

Kazazi, F. (2026, June). Auditory Processing Differences in Stuttering: Evidence from Load Theory of Attention. Podium presentation at the 7th Virtual Conference on Computational Audiology (VCCA 2026), Virtual (on-line). In VCCA 2026 Program & Abstracts book. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20735749